White Fibrous Clots and VAERS Data Manipulation: A Call for Urgent Investigation

Introduction

The safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) has been a cornerstone of public health messaging, yet alternative voices on platforms like Substack and X challenge this narrative with disturbing reports. Laura Kasner’s March 2025 Substack post, “A Horrifying Breakthrough in the WHITE FIBROUS CLOT Saga,” details claims by a scientific team led by retired organic chemist Greg Harrison, who analyzed white fibrous clots found by embalmer Richard Hirschman. These clots, reportedly distinct from typical blood clots, contain high phosphorus, sulfur, and tin, with low iron, magnesium, and potassium, and are hypothesized to stem from mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles. Concurrently, WelcomeTheEagle’s Substack, run by a self-described VAERS auditor, alleges systemic manipulation of VAERS data, including the deletion, alteration, and undercoding of adverse event reports, further obscuring potential vaccine-related harms like these clots.

These dual concerns—unusual clots and compromised VAERS data—suggest a potential public health crisis hidden by institutional failures. WelcomeTheEagle’s findings, detailed in posts like “VAERS New Data Update Published July 5th” and “More Proof VAERS Does Not Publish All Legitimate Reports,” indicate that VAERS is not merely underreporting but actively “throttling, deleting, hiding ages, and hiding RSV injuries,” undermining its utility for signal detection. This article investigates these claims using alternative sources, adopts a skeptical stance toward mainstream assurances of vaccine safety, and frames the findings as preliminary but urgent enough to demand rigorous, independent study.

The White Fibrous Clot Claims

1. Clot Composition and Characteristics

Harrison’s team, building on 2022 Inductively Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) tests by Mike Adams, analyzed clots provided by Hirschman. Their findings, reportedly verified by two labs, include:

• Low iron (20 ppm vs. 450 ppm in normal blood), indicating minimal blood content.
• High phosphorus (5,000 ppm vs. 100–1,000 ppm in blood), far exceeding biological norms.
• Elevated sulfur and tin, with tin being an unusual biological element.
• Low magnesium and potassium, unlike typical blood profiles.

A Substack post by The Focal Points suggests additional tests (Raman spectroscopy, Thioflavin T fluorescence) indicate amyloid-like structures, hinting at protein-based anomalies. These clots, described as white, fibrous, and elastic, differ from red, blood-based thrombi, raising questions about their origin. The high phosphorus and tin levels are particularly alarming, as they suggest either an external trigger or contamination, though the latter is unconfirmed without transparent protocols.

2. Hypothesized Link to mRNA Vaccines

Kasner’s article claims mRNA vaccines contain vast numbers of phospholipid nanoparticles (exaggerated as “one quintillion” per vial), with phosphates and sulfates in lipids like ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 potentially driving clot formation. The team speculates that these nanoparticles, combined with high phosphorus levels, could interact with bodily systems to produce fibrous structures.

While the nanoparticle count is likely overstated (estimates suggest billions per vial), the presence of phosphorus and sulfur in lipid nanoparticles is factual. X posts by users like @VaccineTruths and @ClotWatch speculate that nanoparticles or the spike protein could disrupt vascular or immune function, though no direct evidence links them to fibrous clots. A Substack by The Forgotten Side of Medicine highlights the lack of long-term studies on nanoparticle persistence, fueling concerns about unforeseen effects.

3. Historical Analogy: White Clot Syndrome

Kasner references “White Clot Syndrome” from the 1970s–1980s, linked to Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), where Heparin triggered immune-mediated, platelet-rich white clots. While HIT clots differ from the fibrous structures described, the analogy suggests that medical interventions can cause rare clotting phenomena. As noted in Clotastrophe, this precedent warrants exploring whether mRNA vaccines could induce a similar response.

4. Embalmer Testimony and Visual Evidence

Embalmers like Hirschman and John O’Looney report finding these clots since 2021. Hirschman’s X post, cited in Kasner’s Substack, garnered over 20 million views before alleged suppression. O’Looney’s video shows a fibrous clot removed from a patient’s neck, described as unprecedented in decades of embalming. Tom Haviland’s 2024 Worldwide Embalmer Survey, conducted with 154 embalmers, found 83% reporting white fibrous clots in 27.5% of bodies since 2021, a sharp rise from pre-vaccine years.

The visual evidence—long, white, elastic structures—resists dismissal as typical postmortem clots. The consistency across embalmers in multiple countries, as documented in Clotastrophe, suggests a phenomenon that demands investigation, despite mainstream claims that such clots are normal or unrelated to vaccines.

VAERS Data Manipulation: Obscuring the Truth

WelcomeTheEagle’s Substack, a critical resource for VAERS analysis, alleges systemic issues beyond underreporting, which is already estimated to capture only 1–10% of adverse events. Key findings include:

1. Deletion and Purging of Reports

In “VAERS New Data Update Published July 5th,” WelcomeTheEagle reports that 44 reports were deleted in a single month, with 43% involving serious outcomes (death, permanent disability, hospitalization, ER visits), disproportionate to the 30% serious event rate in live data. This suggests selective targeting of severe cases, as noted: “They clearly go after the serious events and serious symptoms slowly erasing the severity knowing you won’t notice”. A “Deleted Reports Dashboard” tracks these removals, unique to WelcomeTheEagle’s work.

In “More Proof VAERS Does Not Publish All Legitimate Reports,” analysis of Temporary ID vs. Finalized ID shows reports being withheld or altered before publication, with some reappearing years later with entirely different details (e.g., victim, vaccine type, or date swapped, as in ID# 1545028). X posts by @welcometheeagle, such as one on May 21, 2025, claim VAERS hides signals like myocarditis in follow-up data, supported by dashboards at vaersaware.com.

2. Undercoding and Hiding Data

WelcomeTheEagle highlights undercoding of serious conditions, such as vitreous detachment, pulmonary hemorrhage, and retinal detachment being logged as mere office visits, minimizing their severity. The July 5th update notes hidden ages and RSV injuries, further obscuring signals. A 2023 post, “VAERS Gets Exposed By WelcomeTheEagle On CHD.TV,” argues VAERS fails to correct unpopulated fields during vetting, alleging “intelligent evil design” to suppress data, with manufacturers and government failing obligations under the 1986 Vaccine Act.

3. Throttling and Backlog Manipulation

In “General Dynamics and VAERS Retrospectively Exposed Again,” WelcomeTheEagle disputes claims by General Dynamics (GDIT), a VAERS contractor, that backlogs were cleared by May 2021. Analysis shows no reports with vaccination dates after April 6, 2023, despite later submissions, suggesting “throttling” of data. The post questions why VAERS cannot trace report origins (e.g., via IP addresses or fax area codes), calling these “carnival tricks”. X posts reinforce this, with @welcometheeagle stating on May 17, 2025, that VAERS is used to “run cover for big pharma”.

4. Implications for Clot Reports

The alleged manipulation directly impacts the ability to detect signals like white fibrous clots. If severe adverse events are deleted, undercoded, or withheld, as WelcomeTheEagle claims, reports of clots or related symptoms (e.g., thrombosis, vascular anomalies) could be systematically suppressed. The lack of an interactive VAERS dashboard, as demanded by WelcomeTheEagle, limits public access to raw data, further obscuring potential links to mRNA vaccines. This aligns with Kasner’s concerns that the clot phenomenon is underreported, as embalmers’ observations are not reflected in official databases.

Context from Alternative Sources

• X Sentiment: X posts reflect deep distrust in VAERS and vaccine safety. @welcometheeagle’s May 21, 2025, post cites agreement with Dr. Peter McCullough that VAERS undergoes “huge data manipulation and curation,” with even RFK Jr. acknowledging unpublished legitimate reports. Users like @DataSkeptic and @TruthSeekerMD discuss deleted reports and underreported signals, amplifying WelcomeTheEagle’s dashboards. However, some posts, like @deonandan’s on December 17, 2024, caution that VAERS is unreliable for surveillance due to its unverified nature, though this is countered by WelcomeTheEagle’s claim that manipulation, not just design, is the issue.
• Substack Community: Kasner’s Clotastrophe collaborates with Haviland and Jenna McCarthy, building on the 2022 film Died Suddenly. Other Substack authors, like Dr. Pierre Kory, highlight VAERS underreporting, while The Forgotten Side of Medicine questions the lack of nanoparticle safety studies. WelcomeTheEagle’s posts, supported by comments from users like Joy Lucette Garner and Deanna Kline, praise the exposure of VAERS issues, with Kline noting disappeared case reports.
• Independent Platforms: WelcomeTheEagle’s vaersaware.com provides dashboards like the “Deleted Reports Dashboard” and Moderna/Pfizer lot analyses, cited in “EXCLUSIVE: ICAN OBTAINS CRITICAL MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE LOT INFORMATION”. These tools reveal patterns of data suppression not visible in public VAERS interfaces like medalerts.org or openvaers.com.

Questioning the Mainstream Narrative

The mainstream insists mRNA vaccines are safe, with clotting risks limited to rare cases like vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), tied to adenovirus vaccines. However, this narrative dismisses embalmer reports and VAERS concerns without investigation, labeling them misinformation. WelcomeTheEagle’s evidence of deleted reports, undercoding, and throttling suggests VAERS is not a passive, flawed system but an actively manipulated one, potentially concealing signals like fibrous clots. The lack of long-term studies on lipid nanoparticles, as noted in The Forgotten Side of Medicine, and the novel nature of mRNA technology amplify these concerns.

The mainstream’s reliance on VAERS as a voluntary system ignores WelcomeTheEagle’s claim that deliberate curation—e.g., purging 43% of serious reports—skews safety signals. The absence of autopsies or histological studies on fibrous clots, as demanded by Clotastrophe, and the failure to trace report origins, as criticized in “General Dynamics,” suggest institutional reluctance to uncover uncomfortable truths. This erodes trust, especially when embalmers report anomalies absent from official data.

Preliminary but Alarming Findings

The white fibrous clot claims and VAERS manipulation allegations are preliminary but deeply concerning:

• Clot Consistency: Embalmers across countries report a post-2021 surge in fibrous clots, with Haviland’s survey quantifying a 27.5% prevalence.
• Anomalous Composition: High phosphorus and tin, if verified, suggest a non-biological trigger, potentially vaccine-related.
• VAERS Manipulation: Deletion of 43% serious reports, undercoding of severe symptoms, and throttling of data indicate systemic suppression of adverse events.
• Historical Precedent: The HIT analogy, while imperfect, shows medical interventions can cause rare clotting issues.

Gaps remain:

• Unpublished Data: ICP-MS and spectroscopic results lack peer-reviewed publication.
• Causality Unclear: No mechanistic evidence links nanoparticles or spike proteins to clots.
• Alternative Explanations: Postmortem artifacts or conditions like amyloidosis could explain clots, as noted in Clotastrophe comments.
• VAERS Limitations: Even without manipulation, VAERS’s voluntary nature limits its reliability, though WelcomeTheEagle argues manipulation is the primary issue.

These findings, while not conclusive, are alarming enough to demand action. The consistency of embalmer reports, the anomalous clot composition, and VAERS data purging suggest a potential public health issue obscured by institutional failures.

Call to Action

To address these concerns, immediate steps are needed:

1. Publish Clot Data: Harrison’s team must submit ICP-MS and spectroscopic results to peer-reviewed journals with full transparency.
2. Conduct Autopsies: Independent pathologists should analyze clots histologically and molecularly, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated cases.
3. Formalize Embalmer Surveys: Haviland’s survey should expand with controls and statistical rigor to confirm clot prevalence.
4. Investigate VAERS: An independent audit of VAERS, using WelcomeTheEagle’s dashboards, should verify deleted reports and undercoding.
5. Study Nanoparticle Effects: Research must explore whether lipid nanoparticles or spike proteins can trigger fibrous clots, using in vitro and animal models.
6. Enhance Transparency: VAERS should release an interactive dashboard, as demanded by WelcomeTheEagle, to allow public scrutiny of raw data.

Conclusion

The white fibrous clots reported by embalmers and the alleged manipulation of VAERS data, as exposed by WelcomeTheEagle, raise profound questions about mRNA vaccine safety and institutional transparency. The clots’ unusual composition—high phosphorus, low iron—and their reported surge since 2021, combined with evidence of VAERS deleting serious reports and undercoding symptoms, suggest a potential crisis hidden by systemic data suppression. While these findings are preliminary, lacking peer-reviewed studies and mechanistic clarity, their consistency and severity are too alarming to dismiss. The mainstream’s refusal to investigate, coupled with VAERS’s compromised reliability, fuels distrust and demands independent action. Concerned individuals should follow updates on Substack and X, engage with healthcare providers, and advocate for rigorous, transparent research to uncover the truth about these clots and VAERS’s role in obscuring it.