Category: Geopolitics in War

3 min read 0

Doublethink and the Flames of Deception: Revisiting the LA and Hawaii Fires

In the wake of the devastating fires in Los Angeles and Hawaii, particularly those in Lahaina, Maui the public narrative has largely framed these events as natural disasters exacerbated by dry conditions and high winds. However, recent satellite video evidence has begun to challenge this narrative, suggesting that these might not have been entirely natural occurrences. Here, we delve into this discourse, using the Orwellian concept of “doublethink” to frame the complexity of understanding and discussing these events. The term “doublethink” from George Orwell’s 1984 describes the act of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct. In the context of the LA and Hawaii fires, this manifests in the public’s acceptance of the official narrative while new evidence suggests the involvement of what some are calling “exotic…
6 min read 0

The Cost of Conflict: The Interplay of Politics, Profit and Public Health in the mRNA Vaccine Push

The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled a complex web of interactions where financial incentives, political influence and public health intersect, often at the expense of integrity and individual health. This article delves into how these conflicts of interest have shaped the narrative and policy surrounding mRNA vaccines, particularly in the United States. Financial Interests Over Public Health The rapid deployment of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 crisis was underpinned by significant financial stakes. Both pharmaceutical companies and political figures had substantial investments in the success of these vaccines. For instance, reports have highlighted how entities like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the U.S. received millions in royalties from vaccine manufacturers like Moderna, suggesting a potential bias in promoting these vaccines even before full…
6 min read 0

Can Mind Control Ever Be Ethical? A Response to Seminar on Methods and Applications on Mind Control

Introduction: Dr. Giordano, the speaker introduces the topic of mind control and its implications for national security, intelligence and defense operations. He also mentions his involvement in some projects related to neuroscience and technology. Granularity and specificity: The speaker recommends a book on mind wars that explores the use of advanced psychopharmacologics and neuropharmacologics for enhancing human performance and capabilities. He also discusses some DARPA programs that aim to understand how brains and individuals respond to narratives and influence. Validity and of value in national security, intelligence and defense operations: The speaker explains the challenges and limitations of using mind control techniques and technologies for weaponized intelligence and national security agenda. He argues that these methods may have unintended consequences and ethical issues that need to be addressed.…
9 min read 0

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE): A Game-Changer for Federal Spending

The recently announced Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spearheaded by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, represents a bold new initiative under the Trump administration to tackle government waste. By streamlining federal operations and cutting inefficiencies, DOGE aims to redefine how taxpayer dollars are managed and allocated. Here, we explore the key measures DOGE will employ, their real-world examples and the potential impact on various demographics. Measures to Define Government Waste DOGE has identified five critical areas where government inefficiency thrives though it remains unclear if its strategy prioritizes eliminating federal positions leveraging advanced technologies or a combination of both. Clarifying this focus could provide better insight into its overall approach. Expired Program Funding Programs operating without current congressional authorization such as the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) which…
4 min read 0

Modern Privacy Concerns Started with the USA PATRIOT Act

The USA PATRIOT Act, passed shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, significantly expanded the U.S. government’s surveillance and investigative powers to enhance national security. While its proponents argue it is essential for combating terrorism, critics raise serious concerns about how the Act infringes upon privacy rights. Here are the key ways in which the Patriot Act has been criticized for invading privacy: 1. Broad Surveillance Powers The Patriot Act grants government agencies extensive surveillance capabilities, often at the expense of individual privacy: Section 215 (“Library Records Provision”): Allows the FBI to request access to “any tangible things,” such as business records, library checkouts, internet browsing histories, and even medical records, without showing probable cause. The targeted individual might never know they were under surveillance. Mass Data…
4 min read 0

The Hidden Backdoors: Analyzing Router Vulnerabilities and the Call for Open Source Solutions

The conversation surrounding the security of routers and gateways that connect our devices to the internet has grown increasingly complex over the years. As the backbone of digital communication, these devices play a critical role in maintaining privacy, security and sovereignty. However, there is a growing concern that backdoors—intentional or otherwise—have been built into many such devices, especially following the passage of legislation like the USA PATRIOT Act. The Alleged Role of Backdoors in Modern Networking Equipment Backdoors are intentional vulnerabilities or hidden entry points that allow unauthorized or covert access to devices and networks. Many argue that intelligence agencies have compelled manufacturers to include these backdoors in networking equipment, leveraging them as zero-day exploits for reconnaissance and surveillance. The USA PATRIOT Act, enacted in the wake of…
3 min read 0

The Modern Failures of Journalism: A Call for Accountability and Integrity…

As someone who studied journalism in college, it pains me to witness the current state of the industry. Creativity and originality—once the hallmarks of compelling journalism—have been replaced by formulaic, sensationalist content designed to provoke rather than inform. What we now call “yellow journalism” has evolved into a new beast: sensationalism veiled as public relations, where stories are often tailored to serve the interests of specific stakeholders rather than the public good.   The Fairness Doctrine, though flawed in its implementation, was at least an acknowledgment of the need for balance in reporting. Unfortunately, its absence has left a vacuum where bias thrives unchecked. Forcing opposing viewpoints into a single narrative, as the doctrine sometimes did could amplify divisions. However, the principle behind it—ensuring accountability and fostering diverse…
6 min read 0

In The Murk of What Makes a Conflict into a World War…

Determining whether a conflict qualifies as a world war can involve examining the role of external actors, such as a global elite profiting from orchestrating disputes between nations. This elite, often operating beyond the constraints of sovereignty and above the law, wields influence through immense wealth, granting them the power to navigate and evade the negative consequences of their actions across borders. Sometimes referred to as “The Council,” this unelected group is believed to have roots in organizations like the Illuminati and to operate through secretive networks as front groups established through from the use of party houses to established and sometimes prestigious institutions that groom individuals for positions of “power,” conditioned as puppets acting through the wills of The Council. Their influence is metaphorically described as “the…
4 min read 0

The Putin Interviews with Director and Producer Oliver Stone, Contrast to Present Day Conflict:….

Oliver Stone’s The Putin Interviews (2017) provides a platform for Russian President Vladimir Putin to articulate his views on a wide range of issues, including U.S.-Russia relations, NATO and global geopolitics. While the interviews were conducted during the Trump presidency, their content offers insights into the broader dynamics that later influenced the Russia-Ukraine conflict. By examining the positions and concerns voiced by Putin, the series contributes to understanding some of the geopolitical and historical narratives that have shaped Russia’s foreign policy. Key Themes Relevant to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict NATO Expansion and Security Concerns: Putin discusses his apprehension about NATO’s expansion toward Russia’s borders, which he perceives as a direct threat to Russian security. This concern has been a recurring theme in Russia’s foreign policy and is often cited…