The media has perpetuated many misconceptions, with distortions of truth coming from both ends of the political spectrum. However, over the last four to eight years, these distortions have intensified, particularly from left-leaning outlets. Donald Trump has become an inconvenient antidote to many real conspiracies. That said, I acknowledge he is not without serious flaws, some of which challenge commonly held narratives.
Regarding claims of racism attributed to Trump, I have yet to see substantial evidence of this in practice. During the looting incidents, for instance, it was the racist police of that time who distributed bricks across cities, and looters complied without questioning their source. Because racist people, police or in other positions of public support Trump does not implicate Trump’s support in them.
Support for Trump is not conventional. It stems more from a perspective of counsel rather than blind allegiance as it is the public’s civil duty for holding such positions accountable. I shared over 30 letters with Trump during his first term, suggesting actions I believed were critical and some rebuttal to his current policies. While he didn’t reply directly, I saw many of these suggestions reflected in his policies. His receptiveness to ideas—avoiding war with North Korea in 2016, commuting Rod Blagojevich’s sentence, and addressing issues like family separations that fueled global human trafficking which he recently acknowledges—gave me hope.
In the last election, I could not support Kamala Harris under any circumstance. Her leadership, in my view, would have jeopardized the very existence of this country. The potential for her administration to escalate conflicts, potentially leading to World War III, is a reality I cannot accept. My disdain for warmongering and I’m frustrated by the silence of those critical of Trump who fail to address the alternative. Harris would likely have fueled the military-industrial complex in ways detrimental to our future and existence as a people.
Voting is not just about choosing a leader; it’s about fulfilling a civic duty to hold leadership accountable. With Harris, I saw someone who would answer to the public only if it fit a specific narrative—a narrative shaped by globalist agendas. As many have discussed, this is where the intersection of Department of Defense operations, deep state influences, and secret society agendas becomes deeply concerning.
A president aligned with the globalist agenda poses an existential threat to this country. Un-elected global elites have no stake in our nation’s future, yet they exploit propaganda to erode sovereignty and vilify patriotism as racism. This brainwashing, coupled with relentless attacks on Trump, reveals a disturbing trend.
For all of Trump’s flaws, his administration presents an opportunity to avert World War III and pull back from endless wars.
My concern in hindsight lies in the powers Trump may be consolidating and how they might be used or abused by his successor. There’s a valid argument that Trump could be part of a deeper conspiracy—a ruse for even greater control. This possibility is acknowledged by those with deeper insight into these matters of those I have consulted, and I remain cautious. Even so, delaying a New World Order-style agenda, which nearly reached full momentum with Agenda 21 and the pandemic, is preferable to being blindsided by it.
The emergence of figures like RFK Jr. has bolstered my confidence. This election felt less about choosing the lesser evil and more about picking the less cunning option. If Trump remains guided by advisors who value truth over profit, we may finally expose the conspiracies fueling the globalist agenda. This clarity is critical to addressing social and economic duress without misplacing blame.
Ultimately, my conscience remains clear. This election, in my view, determines whether we will have a habitable and sovereign nation or continue to erode into chaos. As it stands, the U.S. has been running on fumes since the end of WWII, with the fiat nature of our dollar symbolic of our decline. And Patriotism as been not only on the chopping block, it has been connotated negatively to imply that such positions are racists.
With Biden escalating conflicts and allowing wars unchecked, we’ve moved closer to existential threats. As these matters of warmongering get resolved, we will see a downgrade from DefCon 3 that began towards and in preparation for the Biden and rather begin rebuilding the strength, stability and health to the people of this country once again as united.
